CLOSE X
Mutual Fund
more from Mutual Fund
HomeMarketsMutual Fund MF UpdatesFund Card

Fund Card

GO

SBI Flexicap Fund-Reg(G)

very highequityflexi cap fund
109.26 -0.50(-0.46%) NAV as on 04 Aug 2026
1.5% 1 M
2.01% 1 Y
8.91% 3 Y

Growth Chart of the Scheme vis a vis benchmark (SIP value 10,000)

  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
  • 10Y
  • max

FUND OBJECTIVE

To provide investors with opportunities for long-term growth in capital along with the liquidity of an open-ended scheme through an active management of investment in a diversified basket of equity stocks spanning the entire market capitalization spectrum and debt and money market instruments.

SCHEME DETAILS

expense_ration-icon Expenses Ratio :

2.12

As on 30 Jun, 2026
age-icon Age :

20 yrs 10 m

Since 16 09 ,2005
exit_load Exit Load :

0.1%

aum AUM :

22,685.08 Crs

lock_in Lock-in :

0.10% on or before 30D, Nil after 30D

investing_style Investing Style :

Large Growth

Portfolio_book_value Portfolio Price To Book Value :

6.59

Min_Investment Min. Investment :

SIP 500 & Lumpsum 1000

Scheme_benchmark Scheme Benchmark :

BSE 500 - TRI

Fund_manager Fund Manager :

Anup Upadhyay

LATEST ASSET & PORTFOLIO ALLOCATION

as on Jun 30 ,2026
Debt 0.79 %
Others 1.43 %
Equity 97.78 %

TOP HOLDINGS

ICICI Bank Ltd.6.66 %
Axis Bank Ltd.4.63 %
HDFC Bank Ltd.4.48 %
Larsen & Toubro Ltd.4.05 %
Bajaj Auto Ltd.3.27 %
See All Holding

ALLOCATION BY MARKET CAP

ALLOCATION BY SECTOR

Bank - Private20.11
Pharmaceuticals & Drugs8.87
Automobile Two & Three Wheelers5.64
Engineering - Construction4.83
Port4.14
See All Sectors

5-YEARS HISTORY

Financial Year2021-20222022-20232023-20242024-20252025-2026
NAV in Rs (as on 31-Mar-2026)76.1873.7696.45101.2197.19
Net Assets(Rs Crores) (as on 31-Mar-2026) 15735.66 15692.52 20283.05 21035.17 20625.69
Scheme Returns(%)(Absolute)19.78-4.0930.363.72-2.89
B'mark Returns(%)(Absolute)NANANANANA
Category Rank115/20426/3630/3929/3925/45

RISKOMETER Level of Risk in the Scheme

Investors understand that their principal will be at very high risk

PERFORMANCE COMPARISON WITH SIMILAR SCHEMES

No data found